Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-03-21 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2005-03-21 House Journal Page 0696 HR 7 Representative Weyhrauch moved and asked unanimous consent that the following be taken up as a Special Order of Business: HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 7 Supporting the efforts of the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities to improve transportation to and from Juneau and supporting development of the East Lynn Canal Highway. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Berkowitz placed a call of the House on the resolution. The call was satisfied. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 2, line 23, following ";": Insert: "and WHEREAS, even thoughthe last vote on this issue showed that Juneau voters supported improved ferry service instead of a road;" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Weyhrauch objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HR 7 Special Order of Business Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses, Salmon 2005-03-21 House Journal Page 0697 Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 2, line 23, following ";": Insert: "and WHEREAS, even though this resolution is being voted on during the last day for public comment during the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) process, and the resolution usurps the public process;" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Weyhrauch objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HR 7 Special Order of Business Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses, Salmon Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Kerttula: 2005-03-21 House Journal Page 0698 Page 2, line 23, following ";": Insert: "and WHEREAS, even though other Southeast communities have opposed the alternative supported by this resolution, preferring continuation of mainline Alaska Marine Highway System service in Lynn Canal;" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Weyhrauch objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HR 7 Special Order of Business Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses, Salmon, Thomas Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Kott: Page 2, lines 30 - 31, following "sent to the": Delete all material and insert: "Honorable Ted Stevens and the Honorable Lisa Murkowski, U.S. Senators, and the Honorable Don Young, U.S. Representative, members of the Alaska delegation in" Representative Kott moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. 2005-03-21 House Journal Page 0699 Representative Berkowitz objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HR 7 Special Order of Business Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 36 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Gatto, Guttenberg, Kelly And so, Amendment No. 4 was adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 2, line 29, following "Terminal": Insert "but only if the maximum amount of federal funds are leveraged to lower the cost to the state" Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Weyhrauch objected. Representative Gruenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that HR 7 am be referred to the Transportation and Finance Committees with all pending amendments. Representative Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall HR 7 am be referred to the Transportation and Finance Committees?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2005-03-21 House Journal Page 0700 HR 7 am Special Order of Business Refer to Transportation and Finance Committees YEAS: 18 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, LeDoux, Moses, Rokeberg, Salmon Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Dahlstrom, Foster, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson And so, the motion failed. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HR 7 am Special Order of Business Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses, Salmon, Thomas Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 2, following line 26, insert: "BE IT RESOLVED that no permanent fund revenues shall be used in this project; and" 2005-03-21 House Journal Page 0701 Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HR 7 am Special Order of Business Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Moses, Salmon Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. The question being: "Shall HR 7 am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HR 7 am Special Order of Business YEAS: 26 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Olson, Ramras, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, LeDoux, Neuman, Rokeberg And so, HR 7 am passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment and enrollment.